Medical negligence can occur during diagnosis, surgery, medication administration, emergency treatment, childbirth, and ongoing patient monitoring.
Medical malpractice claims may involve the following types of mistakes when negligent care causes an injury:
- Delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis: A provider fails to order indicated testing, correctly interpret significant results, refer a patient, or act on warning signs, causing avoidable harm.
- Surgical errors: A wrong-site procedure, retained surgical object, negligent injury to an organ, or failure to recognize a postoperative complication causes additional injury.
- Medication and pharmacy errors: An incorrect drug or dose, overlooked allergy, unsafe interaction, administration mistake, or failure to monitor treatment results in harm.
- Emergency room negligence: Delayed assessment or treatment of a potentially serious condition, such as stroke, sepsis, or internal bleeding, worsens the patient’s outcome.
- Nursing and hospital negligence: A failure to monitor vital signs, communicate a change in condition, respond to alarms, prevent avoidable pressure injuries, or provide appropriate wound care causes injury.
- Anesthesia errors: Negligent airway management, medication administration, monitoring, or response to a patient’s deteriorating condition causes harm.
- Birth injuries: Inappropriate responses to fetal monitoring, delayed emergency intervention, or negligent prenatal or delivery care causes injury to a child or parent.
Diagnosis, Surgical, and Medication Errors
A delayed diagnosis of cancer, stroke, infection, or heart disease may support a claim when negligent delays caused additional injury or reduced the patient’s chance of recovery or survival.
Surgical and medication cases may involve wrong-site procedures, retained objects, improper drug administration, or a failure to respond to complications.
Operative reports, medication records, diagnostic images, and expert opinions may help establish whether the harm resulted from negligent care or an unavoidable complication.
Failure to Obtain Informed Consent
Before treatment, physicians generally must explain material risks so patients can decide whether to consent, subject to recognized exceptions such as emergencies and lawful consent by an authorized representative.
A physician’s failure to obtain informed consent can support a legal claim even when the technical performance of a procedure was not negligent.
Ohio recognizes lack of informed consent as a separate type of medical claim, as explained in White v. Leimbach.
The patient generally must show that the physician failed to explain an important risk, that the undisclosed risk caused the injury, and that a reasonable patient would have declined the treatment if properly informed.
Under Ohio Revised Code § 2317.54, a written consent form meeting the law’s requirements is generally presumed valid, including when it explains the procedure and its reasonably known risks, addresses the patient’s questions, identifies the intended surgeons where required, and is signed by someone authorized to consent.
The presumption can be challenged on grounds specified in the law, and consent may also be given orally or implied in some circumstances.
Signing a form does not answer every question about what the patient was told, but the absence of a signed form does not automatically prove malpractice either.
Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Facility Negligence
Medical malpractice rules may apply to negligent medication management, monitoring, infection treatment, or wound care in nursing homes and rehabilitation facilities.
An injury involving ordinary maintenance or other nonmedical conduct may instead fall under a different legal theory with different filing requirements.